Showing posts with label twilight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label twilight. Show all posts
04 December, 2010
the hangover show
(I'm too embarrassed to transcribe the spoken parts of it, but if watched I'm pretty sure it will produce lulz.)
Yeah so re the fiction thing, it actually isn't a real awesome project, it's kind of a dumb idea. But I read Bible Camp Bloodbath and it was pretty swell (I would really recommend reading Lockpick Pornography by the same author, it was really important to me when I was in high school) and I got all excited about the idea of posting a book in blog form.
But I don't want to post anything actually good because you know someday I would like to get some books published in real life and get a really small amount of money for them. So I was thinking of posting this weird book I wrote when I was 16-18 which is...okay, maybe I just think this because I wrote it, but I feel like it's a pretty terrible book that has a certain charm.
Do you like Twilight? It's kind of the same thing. I genuinely think that even though all the sequels suck, the first Twilight book and movie are genuinely great in their portrayal of two kind of boring people who have a really boring but really intense relationship. Because that's what it feels like when you're a boring person and you have a crush on another boring person! They come into bio lab and you're like OHHH NOOOO and then a bunch of paper flies up right in front of your crotch and it's terrible. Well that's what my book is like.
02 December, 2009
Irony shorts out
I guess the cool thing to say about Twilight is that you’re “hate-watching” it or something. The thing is, there sort of is no division for me between thinking something is genuinely really good, thinking it’s funny because it’s bad, or knowing that it's probably considered trashy but having a sincere enjoyment of it nonetheless. Actually, that's probably not true; I guess I'm just trying to say that there's less division for me, or I'm less conscious of which kind of enjoyment I feel about something.
For example: I theoretically understand that Video Game Pete Campbell is a stupid character, and I make fun of him, but it takes a lot for me to feel something sometimes so I enjoy ridiculously angsty woobie-ish characters. Even though I laugh at him I also have a completely sincere attachment to him, and even when I laugh it's like I'm laughing at a friend.
For another: when I was a kid my dad and I used to listen to Blink-182 in the car together, and why I always need to bring this up as if justifies it I don't know, but anyway, I really love Blink-182. And more recent embarrassing bands like My Chemical Romance. I don't even really understand what makes a band embarrassing--like, I guess for Blink-182 it's because their songs are so simple? But lots of non-embarrassing bands have simple songs. Anyway, I am very quiet about this at my hipster college but I don't really understand how my attachment to MCR for example is just supposed to disappear because their music is melodramatic. I mean, it is, but so what? Am I only supposed to listen to bands that are really tasteful and realistic about everything?
And, also: I have this anthology of 70s and 80s lesbian fiction that I bought at a used bookstore, and my favorite story is about these two physically disabled lesbians who are professors at a college and are always reading Latin and historical biographies, and one of them writes these journal entries where she compares her love for her girlfriend to Jesus ("it goes out it into the world to be put to death"). I thought it was The Best Story and then I sent it to my friend and he was like, "hey, you know this story is really bad, right?" and I was like "...yeah, totally, of course, ha ha!" But I didn't. I mean, I get that it's melodramatic to compare your feelings to Jesus but can't it be awesome at the same time? I think my friend's other complaint was that it was pretentious because they were so overintellectual and didn't talk like people, but I thought that made the story feel pleasantly crowded.
Once I made my dad read the first paragraph of the second chapter of The Sound and the Fury and he said it was pretentious. I know that public opinion is on my side in this case, but I don't really understand the difference between Faulkner's Quentin voice and a lot of things that are generally considered to be Bad Writing. I just know I like writing that's crammed full of pyrotechnics, sometimes.
So, anyway, this was going to be a post about New Moon but I think I'll write about the first Twilight movie instead because I actually don't feel the way about New Moon that I do about Twilight. Obviously the standard reaction you're supposed to have to Twilight is to laugh at how overdramatic it is, and that's definitely a reaction I have to parts of it (more or less depending on who I'm watching it with). At the same time, I can enjoy the movie sincerely.
I really enjoyed the book but the book is definitely something you laugh at because it's dumb. I read it with a notebook so I could write down lines like, "Edward stood outside looking like a male model in an advertisement for raincoats." (Although the voice of the book is very dry, so I guess you could make a case that lines about Edward's unholy gorgeousness are sometimes intended to be funny.)
But unlike the book, the movie is well-made. Maybe I just think that because I like the color green, but really, I think Catherine Hardwicke made the plot and characters better while staying on the same emotional level as the book. When Bella and Edward are looking at each other with super zoomed in eyes, you can laugh at how it's stupid, but the first time I saw the movie I just thought about being in high school, the feeling I had when a girl I liked touched my arm. It made me laugh to see Bella and Edward looking at each other like that, but it was an affectionate, familiar kind of laughter because most teenagers have felt that incredibly obsessive and panicked about someone they have a crush on. I felt sincerely close to them.
My friend Ami really likes the movie too and when we were talking about it she said, "Just so you know, I don't mean because it's funny, I actually think it's a good movie." Which was refreshing to hear because I feel like every smart person who likes this movie is falling all over themselves to insist that they like it an ironic way. For me I can switch a million times from liking something ironically to liking it sincerely, and there's a bunch of different shades of liking in between.
For example: I theoretically understand that Video Game Pete Campbell is a stupid character, and I make fun of him, but it takes a lot for me to feel something sometimes so I enjoy ridiculously angsty woobie-ish characters. Even though I laugh at him I also have a completely sincere attachment to him, and even when I laugh it's like I'm laughing at a friend.
For another: when I was a kid my dad and I used to listen to Blink-182 in the car together, and why I always need to bring this up as if justifies it I don't know, but anyway, I really love Blink-182. And more recent embarrassing bands like My Chemical Romance. I don't even really understand what makes a band embarrassing--like, I guess for Blink-182 it's because their songs are so simple? But lots of non-embarrassing bands have simple songs. Anyway, I am very quiet about this at my hipster college but I don't really understand how my attachment to MCR for example is just supposed to disappear because their music is melodramatic. I mean, it is, but so what? Am I only supposed to listen to bands that are really tasteful and realistic about everything?
And, also: I have this anthology of 70s and 80s lesbian fiction that I bought at a used bookstore, and my favorite story is about these two physically disabled lesbians who are professors at a college and are always reading Latin and historical biographies, and one of them writes these journal entries where she compares her love for her girlfriend to Jesus ("it goes out it into the world to be put to death"). I thought it was The Best Story and then I sent it to my friend and he was like, "hey, you know this story is really bad, right?" and I was like "...yeah, totally, of course, ha ha!" But I didn't. I mean, I get that it's melodramatic to compare your feelings to Jesus but can't it be awesome at the same time? I think my friend's other complaint was that it was pretentious because they were so overintellectual and didn't talk like people, but I thought that made the story feel pleasantly crowded.
Once I made my dad read the first paragraph of the second chapter of The Sound and the Fury and he said it was pretentious. I know that public opinion is on my side in this case, but I don't really understand the difference between Faulkner's Quentin voice and a lot of things that are generally considered to be Bad Writing. I just know I like writing that's crammed full of pyrotechnics, sometimes.
So, anyway, this was going to be a post about New Moon but I think I'll write about the first Twilight movie instead because I actually don't feel the way about New Moon that I do about Twilight. Obviously the standard reaction you're supposed to have to Twilight is to laugh at how overdramatic it is, and that's definitely a reaction I have to parts of it (more or less depending on who I'm watching it with). At the same time, I can enjoy the movie sincerely.
I really enjoyed the book but the book is definitely something you laugh at because it's dumb. I read it with a notebook so I could write down lines like, "Edward stood outside looking like a male model in an advertisement for raincoats." (Although the voice of the book is very dry, so I guess you could make a case that lines about Edward's unholy gorgeousness are sometimes intended to be funny.)
But unlike the book, the movie is well-made. Maybe I just think that because I like the color green, but really, I think Catherine Hardwicke made the plot and characters better while staying on the same emotional level as the book. When Bella and Edward are looking at each other with super zoomed in eyes, you can laugh at how it's stupid, but the first time I saw the movie I just thought about being in high school, the feeling I had when a girl I liked touched my arm. It made me laugh to see Bella and Edward looking at each other like that, but it was an affectionate, familiar kind of laughter because most teenagers have felt that incredibly obsessive and panicked about someone they have a crush on. I felt sincerely close to them.
My friend Ami really likes the movie too and when we were talking about it she said, "Just so you know, I don't mean because it's funny, I actually think it's a good movie." Which was refreshing to hear because I feel like every smart person who likes this movie is falling all over themselves to insist that they like it an ironic way. For me I can switch a million times from liking something ironically to liking it sincerely, and there's a bunch of different shades of liking in between.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
